AdvertiseDonate
Jersey CityNew YorkNewarkPhiladelphiaBaltimoreBostonWashingtonRichmond
Wednesday, November 4, 2026Big-city news, all in one place.
Viral Press Hub · 200 Broadway, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10038
Politics · Raleigh

DOJ seeks Supreme Court help on California votes

The Department of Justice asked the high court for emergency relief Monday, one day before Election Day, after lower courts rejected its demand to pause ballot processing.

By Karan Cabrera ·

Illustration for: DOJ seeks Supreme Court help on California votes
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The Department of Justice filed a notice Monday seeking emergency injunctive relief from the U.S. Supreme Court. The request asks the high court to intervene in a dispute over California's voter rolls. This move comes one day before Election Day.

The federal government wants California to stop processing ballots from 20,000 individuals the DOJ classifies as likely noncitizens. The department argues these ballots should not be counted until citizenship is verified. The appeal follows a series of losses in lower federal courts.

Judge David Carter, a Clinton appointee, previously described the federal actions as a broad pattern of attempted election interference. A divided panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the DOJ's earlier request to set aside these ballots. The panel consisted of Judges Mark Bennett, Gabriel Sanchez, and Patrick Bumatay.

Judges Bennett and Sanchez wrote that granting the federal request created a material risk of disenfranchisement. They noted the risk could jeopardize the entire election in Los Angeles County. The two cited the Purcell principle, which discourages changing election rules on the eve of an election. They also referenced the National Voter Registration Act, which restricts removing ineligible voters within 90 days of a federal election.

Judge Bumatay dissented from the decision. The DOJ continues to argue its list is reliable. However, courts have sided with California and Los Angeles County officials who claim the federal list is unreliable. Officials state that creating a new system to segregate ballots while voting is underway is infeasible.

The actual number of disputed ballots is likely lower than 20,000. County election officials found many people on the DOJ list did not have active registrations or receive mailed ballots. Data scientists at the UCLA Voting Rights Project analyzed the list after a court order in a separate lawsuit. They found that 42 percent of the names did not appear on California's current voter roll. The analysis also identified naturalized citizens on the list.

The legal fight has escalated in recent weeks. The DOJ has sent subpoenas to California election officials and warned of potential criminal prosecution for allowing ineligible voters. A federal judge in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order late Friday. The order bars the administration from threatening or coercing officials to stop processing ballots. The federal government has appealed that order.

Source: WUNC

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Viral Press Hub in your inboxBig-city news, all in one place. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Latest stories

  1. Democrats seize Congress, signaling a major shift in tech politics
  2. Runner’s death at New York City Marathon draws attention to rare race risks
  3. Abdul El-Sayed projected to win Michigan Senate seat in historic election
  4. Former US contractor admits passing classified intelligence to Ethiopia
  5. Delhi tightens pollution controls as air quality deteriorates before Diwali
Get Viral Press Hub in your inboxBig-city news, all in one place. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.